Wrongful Termination

Do I have any chance of winning a wrongful or constructive termination case based on the following:

Wrongful constructive termination

I live in a community in PA. It is a HOA. For the period of 5/05 - 10/07 I was also employed by the Association that is until I was constructively terminated on 10/8/07. Here is my story:

May 2004, as a result of a letter to the editor, I was asked to volunteer as the editor-in-chief of our community newspaper. I accept and am the editor-in-chief until around 11/04 when the workload is too much and I can no longer volunteer. A new volunteer takes over.

In May 2005, the community contacts me and asks if I would consider being the managing editor of the paper. They offer me $8.00 per hour for the work I complete at home assisting the current editor-in-chief with the technical side of getting the paper to print. I accept and document the time spent (at my home office) and submit same, monthly for payment.

June 2006 a part time secretarial position (for our association) is advertised and I reply to this ad. During the interview the General Manager offers me another part-time position at the community center which entails part manager on duty, part administrative duties. I accept letting him know I can only work weekdays and would not be able to work either nights or weekends. He accepts and I start 7/4/06.

October 2006 after my 90 days I request an increase in pay as a result of the complexity of the work performed and experience I bring to the position. General Manager agrees I am deserving and processes an increase.

April 2007 Board of Directors are on a mission to have every employee sign their job descriptions (something that should have been a part of the hiring process?) Since my job was a new position the board had me incorporate the administrative duties I was responsible for with the manager on duty job description. I signed this job description under the title of "Daytime MOD and Administrative Assistant," on 4/19/07 noting on the manager on duty sheet that the employer hired me knowing I could not work nights, weekends or holidays. In addition, the managing editor duties that I carried out separately and submitted a separate time sheet for, were never incorporated as a part of the job description I signed on 4/19/07.

May 2007 after a conversation with the general manager, we agree that there are other projects I can assist with as a result of my experience, and I become a full time hourly employee, working on average 40 hours a week. I am also given 2 weeks paid vacation, paid holidays and sick pay. I am eligible for medical benefits but decline since I am covered under my husband's benefits.

July 2007 as a result of censorship issues (the board of directors were prohibiting us from running a news story) with regard to our community newspaper, the volunteer editor-in-chief is removed from his position. Because I do not wish to be associated with a censored publication which would become the voice of the board of directors, I resign from my position as managing editor. Certain board members feel that because I am an employee they dispute my resignation and threaten my employment as a result of the resignation. After my resignation as managing editor nothing else is said or written with regard to my being required to perform the managing editor duties as a part of my current job description.

August 2007 The previous editor-in-chief is upset by the lack of free press for our community and decides to run for the board of directors. I sign his petition to run from the floor and support his candidacy. He wins a seat on the board.

September 2007 on 9/5/07, the general manager sends a memo requiring employees to attend a meeting, with members of the board, where a revised personnel and policy manual will be distributed and discussed. (not all members of the board are told about this meeting) I took the initiative to inform our newest director who made it a point to attend the meeting. All employees are required to sign that they attended the meeting and received a copy of the manual. No where in the manual does it state that we are "at will employees" however it does outline reasons for termination and a progressive disciplinary action procedure.

Summary of documentation (I have in my possession) leading up to the constructive termination of Denise Wilson
Document 1 Dated 9/24/07 Memo to General manager from myself questioning Restaurant party discounts as they relate to employees and board members. (attached to memo are copies of 3 invoices for 3 board member parties marked up with an �employee� discount and a waiver of room rental fee per another board member (As of the 10/27 board meeting, an investigation has been launched into the existence of 20% employee discount as it relates to party rentals. As of the board meeting, no employee or staff member could locate a print copy of said policy)
� Document 2 � Dated 1/8/07 � Memorandum/Invoice for (current employee) party showing no employee discount.
� Document 3 � Dated 10/4/07 � E-mail from myself to General Manager questioning employment status after 10/3 meeting where she was told that she was being demoted.
� Document 4 � Dated 10/5/07 � Memo from General Manager to myself further detailing demotion (stripping of administrative asst. duties and reduction in hours). Reason given �after discussion with several Board members they felt that a current part-time employee (Lead MOD) should be handling these responsibilities.� Instructed to meet with Lead MOD to determine my new hourly work schedule.
� Document 5 � Dated 10/8/07 � E-mail from myself to General manager recanting what took place during meeting with Lead MOD regarding my new hours and basis for constructive termination claim.
� Document 6 � Dated 10/9/07 � Memo from Lead MOD to myself confirming that only 14 hours were available weekly during nights and weekends.
� Document 7 � Signed 4/19/07 � Job Description signed by myself confirming I was hired with employer knowing I could only work weekdays and further confirming constructive termination.

2 answers  |  asked Oct 28, 2007 08:15 AM [EST]  |  applies to Pennsylvania

Answers (2)

Harold Goldner
Pennsylvania is still an At-Will State

First of all, it is completely impossible for me to render legal advice via a website, especially, given your own complicated history which requires your own reference to documents you believe are pertinent.

However, the bottom line is that Pennsylvania is an at-will state, and 'wrongful termination' as a cause of action only exists for violations of 'public policy,' and our courts have interpreted 'public policy' to mean almost exclusively 'legislative enactment.'

While it is remotely possible that a first amendment (freedom of speech) argument can be made, if your job duties included newspaper responsibilities --- in fact, if your job duties included standing on your head and spitting nickles --- and you fail or refuse to do so, you will likely find yourself unemployed.

As to the 'constructive discharge' aspects, you haven't given any facts to suggest constructive discharge. Were you fired or not? If you left because 'no reasonable person would remain' under the circumstances, then it *might* be constructive discharge, but that depends upon who was the reasonable person.

In short, your facts are not particularly conducive to this forum, and I encourage you to try to speak to an attorney.

Harold

posted by Harold Goldner  |  Oct 29, 2007 07:15 AM [EST]
Harold Goldner
zoy

posted by Harold Goldner  |  Oct 29, 2007 07:11 AM [EST]

Answer This Question

Sign In to Answer this Question

Related Questions with Answers

Have an Employment Law question?